Skip to content

⚗️ random xunitv3 errors forces me to disable caching #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
gimlichael merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2025
Merged

⚗️ random xunitv3 errors forces me to disable caching #131

gimlichael merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2025

Conversation

@gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 12, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

This pull request simplifies the GitHub Actions pipeline configuration by removing the Linux restore cache job and all related cache logic. This change streamlines the workflow, ensuring that all jobs now perform a fresh restore instead of relying on cached dependencies. The update also clarifies job dependencies and improves maintainability.

Pipeline configuration simplification:

  • Removed the prepare_linux job and all references to it, including dependencies and cache key usages in build, pack, test_linux, and integration_test jobs.
  • Eliminated all steps and configuration related to restoring the cache, such as the explicit cache restore step and cache key parameters in relevant jobs. [1] [2] [3]
  • Updated job dependencies so that jobs now depend directly on the necessary build and test preparation steps, removing unnecessary links to the removed cache job. [1] [2]

Restore logic adjustments:

  • Added restore: true to test jobs to ensure dependencies are restored without caching, making the pipeline more robust and explicit. [1] [2]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced internal CI/CD pipeline configuration to improve development and deployment efficiency. Streamlined workflow by consolidating job dependencies, removing redundant preparation stages, and optimizing cache restoration mechanisms across multiple pipeline stages. These infrastructure improvements reduce build complexity and execution time while maintaining the same output quality and reliability for development and deployment processes.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 12, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

GitHub Actions pipeline refactored to eliminate the prepare_linux job and consolidate cache restoration logic. Downstream jobs now directly manage cache restoration via restore: true flags instead of depending on a dedicated preparation job.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
GitHub Actions pipeline refactoring
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml		 Removed prepare_linux job and its outputs; updated pack, test_linux, and integration_test job dependencies to no longer depend on prepare_linux; added restore: true to test step; removed Restore Cache workflow block from integration_test; replaced explicit restore-cache-key references with direct restore: true usage

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify that all downstream jobs (pack, test_linux, integration_test) now have correct dependency chains without prepare_linux
  • Confirm restore: true flag properly enables cache restoration in test_linux where caching was previously disabled
  • Ensure no orphaned references to prepare_linux remain in the workflow

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 The caches hop now free and clear,
No prep job needed—cache is near!
Direct restoration, swift and clean,
The simplest pipeline you've ever seen! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: disabling caching in the CI/CD workflow to resolve xunitv3 errors, which aligns with the removal of the prepare_linux job and caching logic.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch v10.0.0/disable-caching
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c493047 and 2975fc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (3)

25-162: All references to prepare_linux have been successfully removed.

Verification confirms:

  • No job depends on prepare_linux in needs clauses
  • No step outputs from prepare_linux are referenced
  • No cache restoration patterns targeting removed cache keys exist

The workflow now correctly uses prepare_test for matrix generation in the test_linux and test_windows jobs.

84-84: No inconsistencies found. All test jobs that require explicit restoration are consistently configured.

The verification confirms that the three jobs performing dotnet test operations (test_linux, test_windows, and integration_test) all have restore: true configured consistently. These are the only jobs in the workflow that require explicit restoration for dependency caching, and all have been properly covered. The remaining jobs use different reusable workflows or perform operations that don't require explicit restore parameters.

61-61: I need to search specifically for the jobs-dotnet-pack workflow repository to inspect its inputs.

Let me search for a concrete example of how the jobs-dotnet-pack workflow is used.

Based on my web search investigation, I found that the documented inputs for the codebeltnet/dotnet-pack action are projects and verbosity-level, with no mention of a restore parameter.

Additionally, dotnet pack runs implicit restore automatically, with the --no-restore option available to disable it. The search results do not show a restore parameter as a supported input for the jobs-dotnet-pack reusable workflow.

However, since I could not directly access the workflow definition for jobs-dotnet-pack@v3 to definitively confirm whether it accepts a restore parameter, I recommend verifying this in the actual workflow file or documentation.

Verify whether restore: true is required or supported for the pack job.

The review comment suggests adding restore: true to the pack job to match the test jobs' pattern. However, web searches indicate the jobs-dotnet-pack workflow's documented inputs do not include a restore parameter. Since the actual workflow definition couldn't be confirmed through available sources, verify directly in the codebeltnet/jobs-dotnet-pack repository whether this parameter is supported. If unsupported, the current implementation is correct and requires no changes.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 118800a into main Nov 12, 2025
21 of 155 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v10.0.0/disable-caching branch November 12, 2025 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@gimlichael gimlichael

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gimlichael